Most telehealth advertising problems are not caught by a reviewer — they are built in months earlier, in the creative brief, the landing page, and the tracking setup. This is the workflow we use to keep them out.
Audit Your Advertising WorkflowCompliance-aware telehealth marketing means building campaigns, pages, and tracking against the platform policies and disclosure obligations that apply to health advertising, and documenting who approved what. It reduces the chance of a disapproval, an account restriction, or a claim you cannot substantiate.
It is a workflow, not a legal opinion. We are not a law firm or a regulatory advisor, and nothing on this page is legal advice.
This work is usually triggered by one of four events.
Ads were disapproved or the account was limited, and the team is rebuilding without knowing which element caused it.
The brand is launching a programme in a more sensitive category and wants the creative and page reviewed before spend, not after.
Legal, clinical, or a diligence process has asked how marketing claims are substantiated and how patient data flows through the marketing stack.
Third parties are promoting the brand and nobody can currently see what they are saying.
The reasons a previous ad was rejected are rarely written down. New creative repeats old mistakes because there is no shared, current record of what the platforms actually restrict for this brand's category.
Statistics, outcome claims, and testimonials accumulate across a site with no record of their source, date, or context. When someone finally asks, nobody can produce the evidence, and the safest response is to pull the page.
Marketing tags placed on intake, scheduling, or portal pages can transmit far more than page views. This is one of the most common and most consequential findings in a healthcare marketing audit.
Applied to new campaigns before launch, and retrospectively to what is already live.
Every live ad, landing page, claim, testimonial, and marketing tag is catalogued with its owner and its current status. Most engagements find assets nobody remembered were running.
Each asset is checked against the advertising policies that apply to its channel and category, and against the disclosure obligations attached to its format — including whether the ad category requires authorisation or certification.
Every factual and performance claim gets a source, a date, and a named owner, or it is rewritten or removed. Testimonials get documented consent and typicality context.
We map what each marketing tag can capture on each page type, and remove or restrict tags on pages where health information could be exposed. Server-side and consent-gated alternatives are implemented where measurement is still needed.
An approved-language library, a pre-launch checklist, a claims register with review dates, and a partner monitoring routine — so the state achieved in the audit does not decay over the next two quarters.
The areas below are the recurring sources of exposure in telehealth marketing.
It means the workflow is designed around known platform policies and disclosure obligations, that claims carry evidence, that patient data is kept out of marketing tools, and that decisions are documented.
It does not mean a legal opinion, a certification, a guarantee of platform approval, or a defence in a regulatory action. Where a question is genuinely legal — the lawfulness of a specific offer, a state-law question, a privacy determination — the answer comes from the client's counsel, not from us. We will tell you plainly when we have reached that line.
The output is a documented state, tracked over time.
The deliverable is the artefact: an inventory of your live assets with a status against each, a claims register with sources and owners, a data-flow map of your marketing tags by page type, and a pre-launch checklist your team can run without us.
We do not publish client compliance outcomes, and we would not publish yours.
No, and any agency that says otherwise is describing something it does not control. Platforms make their own decisions, apply automated review, and change policy without notice. What a review does is remove the elements that are known to trigger disapproval and give you a documented basis to appeal when an automated decision is wrong.
Digital Wellness Partners provides marketing operations and compliance-aware workflows. We are not a law firm or regulatory advisor. Clients should obtain qualified legal, privacy, medical, and regulatory advice. Nothing on this page is legal advice.
Written by Simeon Krastev · Last reviewed August 7, 2026
We inventory what is live, map it against platform policy and disclosure obligations, and hand back a checklist your team can run every quarter.
Audit Your Advertising Workflow